Review




Structured Review

Cosmo Genetech Co superfolder green fluorescent protein
Superfolder Green Fluorescent Protein, supplied by Cosmo Genetech Co, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/superfolder+green+fluorescent+protein/pm41253226-59-8-42?v=Cosmo+Genetech+Co
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
superfolder green fluorescent protein - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars

Images



Similar Products

86
Molecular Dynamics Inc superfolder green fluorescent protein
Superfolder Green Fluorescent Protein, supplied by Molecular Dynamics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/superfolder+green+fluorescent+protein/pm41784459-299-54-45?v=Molecular+Dynamics+Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
superfolder green fluorescent protein - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Sangon Biotech gene fragments encoding superfolder green fluorescent protein
Gene Fragments Encoding Superfolder Green Fluorescent Protein, supplied by Sangon Biotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/superfolder+green+fluorescent+protein/pm41571921-73-23-53?v=Sangon+Biotech
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gene fragments encoding superfolder green fluorescent protein - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Addgene inc superfolder green fluorescent protein sfgfp gene
Schematic representation of the genetic constructs of the dual-inducer system ( a ) and two single‑reporter constructs ( b ) for <t>fluorescent</t> reporter proteins expression. c , d Fluorescence fold change of dual‑inducer vs. single‑reporter across inducer concentrations. c mCherry-only vs. mCherry-dual: NS at 0 µM IPTG; P = 0.0003, <0.0001 ( P = 0.00000058), and <0.0001 ( P = 0.000003) at 20, 200, and 400 µM. d <t>sfGFP-only</t> vs. sfGFP-dual: NS for all. e , f Fluorescence fold change of the dual-inducer vs. single-reporter without the corresponding inducer. e mCherry-dual vs. mCherry-only. P = 0.00461, 0.0165, <0.0001 ( P = 0.00002) at 0, 50, 500 ng/mL aTc. NS at 1000 ng/mL. f sfGFP-dual vs. sfGFP-only. NS at 0, 20, 200 µM IPTG; P = 0.00461 at 400 μM. Schematic representation of the dual-inducer system induced with varying concentrations of IPTG at fixed aTc concentration ( g ) or with varying concentrations of aTc at fixed IPTG concentration ( j ). Fold change in mCherry ( h ) and sfGFP ( k ). mCherry: 0 vs. 500 ng/mL aTc across IPTG concentrations: NS at 0, 20 µM; P = 0.0238, 0.0044 at 200, 400 µM. sfGFP: 0 vs. 200 µM IPTG across aTc concentrations: NS at 0, 50 ng/mL; P = 0.0089, 0.0012 at 500, 1000 ng/mL. Fold change in sfGFP ( i ) and mCherry ( l ). i sfGFP-dual cultures at 500 ng/mL aTc without IPTG vs. 0–400 µM IPTG: NS at 0 µM; P = 0.0009, 0.0007, 0.0010 at 20, 200, 400 µM. l mCherry-dual cultures at 200 µM IPTG without aTc vs. 0–1000 ng/mL aTc: NS at 0 ng/mL; P = 0.0478, 0.0013, 0.0145 at 50, 500, 1000 ng/mL. Fold change in c – f , h , i , k , l is plotted in arbitrary units (AU, y -axis), data representing mean ± s.d. ( n = 6 biologically independent samples). Statistics: c , d , h , k by two-tailed unpaired Welch t-test; e , f , i , l vs. grey controls by Brown–Forsythe and Welch one-way ANOVA with Dunnett T3 correction.
Superfolder Green Fluorescent Protein Sfgfp Gene, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/superfolder+green+fluorescent+protein/pmc12848028-344-16-25?v=Addgene+inc
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
superfolder green fluorescent protein sfgfp gene - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Cosmo Genetech Co superfolder green fluorescent protein
Schematic representation of the genetic constructs of the dual-inducer system ( a ) and two single‑reporter constructs ( b ) for <t>fluorescent</t> reporter proteins expression. c , d Fluorescence fold change of dual‑inducer vs. single‑reporter across inducer concentrations. c mCherry-only vs. mCherry-dual: NS at 0 µM IPTG; P = 0.0003, <0.0001 ( P = 0.00000058), and <0.0001 ( P = 0.000003) at 20, 200, and 400 µM. d <t>sfGFP-only</t> vs. sfGFP-dual: NS for all. e , f Fluorescence fold change of the dual-inducer vs. single-reporter without the corresponding inducer. e mCherry-dual vs. mCherry-only. P = 0.00461, 0.0165, <0.0001 ( P = 0.00002) at 0, 50, 500 ng/mL aTc. NS at 1000 ng/mL. f sfGFP-dual vs. sfGFP-only. NS at 0, 20, 200 µM IPTG; P = 0.00461 at 400 μM. Schematic representation of the dual-inducer system induced with varying concentrations of IPTG at fixed aTc concentration ( g ) or with varying concentrations of aTc at fixed IPTG concentration ( j ). Fold change in mCherry ( h ) and sfGFP ( k ). mCherry: 0 vs. 500 ng/mL aTc across IPTG concentrations: NS at 0, 20 µM; P = 0.0238, 0.0044 at 200, 400 µM. sfGFP: 0 vs. 200 µM IPTG across aTc concentrations: NS at 0, 50 ng/mL; P = 0.0089, 0.0012 at 500, 1000 ng/mL. Fold change in sfGFP ( i ) and mCherry ( l ). i sfGFP-dual cultures at 500 ng/mL aTc without IPTG vs. 0–400 µM IPTG: NS at 0 µM; P = 0.0009, 0.0007, 0.0010 at 20, 200, 400 µM. l mCherry-dual cultures at 200 µM IPTG without aTc vs. 0–1000 ng/mL aTc: NS at 0 ng/mL; P = 0.0478, 0.0013, 0.0145 at 50, 500, 1000 ng/mL. Fold change in c – f , h , i , k , l is plotted in arbitrary units (AU, y -axis), data representing mean ± s.d. ( n = 6 biologically independent samples). Statistics: c , d , h , k by two-tailed unpaired Welch t-test; e , f , i , l vs. grey controls by Brown–Forsythe and Welch one-way ANOVA with Dunnett T3 correction.
Superfolder Green Fluorescent Protein, supplied by Cosmo Genetech Co, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/superfolder+green+fluorescent+protein/pm41253226-59-8-42?v=Cosmo+Genetech+Co
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
superfolder green fluorescent protein - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Addgene inc monomeric superfold green fluorescent protein (msfgfp) coding sequence
Schematic representation of the genetic constructs of the dual-inducer system ( a ) and two single‑reporter constructs ( b ) for <t>fluorescent</t> reporter proteins expression. c , d Fluorescence fold change of dual‑inducer vs. single‑reporter across inducer concentrations. c mCherry-only vs. mCherry-dual: NS at 0 µM IPTG; P = 0.0003, <0.0001 ( P = 0.00000058), and <0.0001 ( P = 0.000003) at 20, 200, and 400 µM. d <t>sfGFP-only</t> vs. sfGFP-dual: NS for all. e , f Fluorescence fold change of the dual-inducer vs. single-reporter without the corresponding inducer. e mCherry-dual vs. mCherry-only. P = 0.00461, 0.0165, <0.0001 ( P = 0.00002) at 0, 50, 500 ng/mL aTc. NS at 1000 ng/mL. f sfGFP-dual vs. sfGFP-only. NS at 0, 20, 200 µM IPTG; P = 0.00461 at 400 μM. Schematic representation of the dual-inducer system induced with varying concentrations of IPTG at fixed aTc concentration ( g ) or with varying concentrations of aTc at fixed IPTG concentration ( j ). Fold change in mCherry ( h ) and sfGFP ( k ). mCherry: 0 vs. 500 ng/mL aTc across IPTG concentrations: NS at 0, 20 µM; P = 0.0238, 0.0044 at 200, 400 µM. sfGFP: 0 vs. 200 µM IPTG across aTc concentrations: NS at 0, 50 ng/mL; P = 0.0089, 0.0012 at 500, 1000 ng/mL. Fold change in sfGFP ( i ) and mCherry ( l ). i sfGFP-dual cultures at 500 ng/mL aTc without IPTG vs. 0–400 µM IPTG: NS at 0 µM; P = 0.0009, 0.0007, 0.0010 at 20, 200, 400 µM. l mCherry-dual cultures at 200 µM IPTG without aTc vs. 0–1000 ng/mL aTc: NS at 0 ng/mL; P = 0.0478, 0.0013, 0.0145 at 50, 500, 1000 ng/mL. Fold change in c – f , h , i , k , l is plotted in arbitrary units (AU, y -axis), data representing mean ± s.d. ( n = 6 biologically independent samples). Statistics: c , d , h , k by two-tailed unpaired Welch t-test; e , f , i , l vs. grey controls by Brown–Forsythe and Welch one-way ANOVA with Dunnett T3 correction.
Monomeric Superfold Green Fluorescent Protein (Msfgfp) Coding Sequence, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/superfolder+green+fluorescent+protein/pm39334482-69-8-16?v=Addgene+inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
monomeric superfold green fluorescent protein (msfgfp) coding sequence - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Azenta gene encoding a superfolder green fluorescent protein (sfgfp)
Schematic representation of the genetic constructs of the dual-inducer system ( a ) and two single‑reporter constructs ( b ) for <t>fluorescent</t> reporter proteins expression. c , d Fluorescence fold change of dual‑inducer vs. single‑reporter across inducer concentrations. c mCherry-only vs. mCherry-dual: NS at 0 µM IPTG; P = 0.0003, <0.0001 ( P = 0.00000058), and <0.0001 ( P = 0.000003) at 20, 200, and 400 µM. d <t>sfGFP-only</t> vs. sfGFP-dual: NS for all. e , f Fluorescence fold change of the dual-inducer vs. single-reporter without the corresponding inducer. e mCherry-dual vs. mCherry-only. P = 0.00461, 0.0165, <0.0001 ( P = 0.00002) at 0, 50, 500 ng/mL aTc. NS at 1000 ng/mL. f sfGFP-dual vs. sfGFP-only. NS at 0, 20, 200 µM IPTG; P = 0.00461 at 400 μM. Schematic representation of the dual-inducer system induced with varying concentrations of IPTG at fixed aTc concentration ( g ) or with varying concentrations of aTc at fixed IPTG concentration ( j ). Fold change in mCherry ( h ) and sfGFP ( k ). mCherry: 0 vs. 500 ng/mL aTc across IPTG concentrations: NS at 0, 20 µM; P = 0.0238, 0.0044 at 200, 400 µM. sfGFP: 0 vs. 200 µM IPTG across aTc concentrations: NS at 0, 50 ng/mL; P = 0.0089, 0.0012 at 500, 1000 ng/mL. Fold change in sfGFP ( i ) and mCherry ( l ). i sfGFP-dual cultures at 500 ng/mL aTc without IPTG vs. 0–400 µM IPTG: NS at 0 µM; P = 0.0009, 0.0007, 0.0010 at 20, 200, 400 µM. l mCherry-dual cultures at 200 µM IPTG without aTc vs. 0–1000 ng/mL aTc: NS at 0 ng/mL; P = 0.0478, 0.0013, 0.0145 at 50, 500, 1000 ng/mL. Fold change in c – f , h , i , k , l is plotted in arbitrary units (AU, y -axis), data representing mean ± s.d. ( n = 6 biologically independent samples). Statistics: c , d , h , k by two-tailed unpaired Welch t-test; e , f , i , l vs. grey controls by Brown–Forsythe and Welch one-way ANOVA with Dunnett T3 correction.
Gene Encoding A Superfolder Green Fluorescent Protein (Sfgfp), supplied by Azenta, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/superfolder+green+fluorescent+protein/pmc11394524-76-1-25?v=Azenta
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gene encoding a superfolder green fluorescent protein (sfgfp) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Schematic representation of the genetic constructs of the dual-inducer system ( a ) and two single‑reporter constructs ( b ) for fluorescent reporter proteins expression. c , d Fluorescence fold change of dual‑inducer vs. single‑reporter across inducer concentrations. c mCherry-only vs. mCherry-dual: NS at 0 µM IPTG; P = 0.0003, <0.0001 ( P = 0.00000058), and <0.0001 ( P = 0.000003) at 20, 200, and 400 µM. d sfGFP-only vs. sfGFP-dual: NS for all. e , f Fluorescence fold change of the dual-inducer vs. single-reporter without the corresponding inducer. e mCherry-dual vs. mCherry-only. P = 0.00461, 0.0165, <0.0001 ( P = 0.00002) at 0, 50, 500 ng/mL aTc. NS at 1000 ng/mL. f sfGFP-dual vs. sfGFP-only. NS at 0, 20, 200 µM IPTG; P = 0.00461 at 400 μM. Schematic representation of the dual-inducer system induced with varying concentrations of IPTG at fixed aTc concentration ( g ) or with varying concentrations of aTc at fixed IPTG concentration ( j ). Fold change in mCherry ( h ) and sfGFP ( k ). mCherry: 0 vs. 500 ng/mL aTc across IPTG concentrations: NS at 0, 20 µM; P = 0.0238, 0.0044 at 200, 400 µM. sfGFP: 0 vs. 200 µM IPTG across aTc concentrations: NS at 0, 50 ng/mL; P = 0.0089, 0.0012 at 500, 1000 ng/mL. Fold change in sfGFP ( i ) and mCherry ( l ). i sfGFP-dual cultures at 500 ng/mL aTc without IPTG vs. 0–400 µM IPTG: NS at 0 µM; P = 0.0009, 0.0007, 0.0010 at 20, 200, 400 µM. l mCherry-dual cultures at 200 µM IPTG without aTc vs. 0–1000 ng/mL aTc: NS at 0 ng/mL; P = 0.0478, 0.0013, 0.0145 at 50, 500, 1000 ng/mL. Fold change in c – f , h , i , k , l is plotted in arbitrary units (AU, y -axis), data representing mean ± s.d. ( n = 6 biologically independent samples). Statistics: c , d , h , k by two-tailed unpaired Welch t-test; e , f , i , l vs. grey controls by Brown–Forsythe and Welch one-way ANOVA with Dunnett T3 correction.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: Temporal gene regulation enables controlled expression of gas vesicles and preserves bacterial viability

doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-67667-8

Figure Lengend Snippet: Schematic representation of the genetic constructs of the dual-inducer system ( a ) and two single‑reporter constructs ( b ) for fluorescent reporter proteins expression. c , d Fluorescence fold change of dual‑inducer vs. single‑reporter across inducer concentrations. c mCherry-only vs. mCherry-dual: NS at 0 µM IPTG; P = 0.0003, <0.0001 ( P = 0.00000058), and <0.0001 ( P = 0.000003) at 20, 200, and 400 µM. d sfGFP-only vs. sfGFP-dual: NS for all. e , f Fluorescence fold change of the dual-inducer vs. single-reporter without the corresponding inducer. e mCherry-dual vs. mCherry-only. P = 0.00461, 0.0165, <0.0001 ( P = 0.00002) at 0, 50, 500 ng/mL aTc. NS at 1000 ng/mL. f sfGFP-dual vs. sfGFP-only. NS at 0, 20, 200 µM IPTG; P = 0.00461 at 400 μM. Schematic representation of the dual-inducer system induced with varying concentrations of IPTG at fixed aTc concentration ( g ) or with varying concentrations of aTc at fixed IPTG concentration ( j ). Fold change in mCherry ( h ) and sfGFP ( k ). mCherry: 0 vs. 500 ng/mL aTc across IPTG concentrations: NS at 0, 20 µM; P = 0.0238, 0.0044 at 200, 400 µM. sfGFP: 0 vs. 200 µM IPTG across aTc concentrations: NS at 0, 50 ng/mL; P = 0.0089, 0.0012 at 500, 1000 ng/mL. Fold change in sfGFP ( i ) and mCherry ( l ). i sfGFP-dual cultures at 500 ng/mL aTc without IPTG vs. 0–400 µM IPTG: NS at 0 µM; P = 0.0009, 0.0007, 0.0010 at 20, 200, 400 µM. l mCherry-dual cultures at 200 µM IPTG without aTc vs. 0–1000 ng/mL aTc: NS at 0 ng/mL; P = 0.0478, 0.0013, 0.0145 at 50, 500, 1000 ng/mL. Fold change in c – f , h , i , k , l is plotted in arbitrary units (AU, y -axis), data representing mean ± s.d. ( n = 6 biologically independent samples). Statistics: c , d , h , k by two-tailed unpaired Welch t-test; e , f , i , l vs. grey controls by Brown–Forsythe and Welch one-way ANOVA with Dunnett T3 correction.

Article Snippet: The monomeric Cherry red fluorescent protein (mCherry) gene was obtained from Addgene (plasmid #29747), and the superfolder green fluorescent protein (sfGFP) gene was acquired from Addgene (plasmid #85492).

Techniques: Construct, Expressing, Fluorescence, Concentration Assay, Two Tailed Test